U.S. involvement in Syria

The United States has always tried to be an advocate for a few things that our own government was based off. One of these things is free speech. Over the course of the last few months in Syria, the government has not only been denying their people of free speech, but killing those who protest. Police brutality, snipers, and possibly chemical weapons have all been used against the protesters, leaving many people dead, including women and children. BBC news stated: “Mr Assad again denied claims that his troops had used chemical weapons, blaming the rebels instead.” (BBC , 2013) The reason that the United States was so against the idea of intervening is ultimately fear. Not necessarily that the United States army would have any trouble with the Syrian army, but that more people may die if Bashar Assad makes a drastic move. The idea that he may have possibly used chemical weapons on protesters leaves the United States government to believe that he may use similar tactics in defense of intervention.


BBC. (2013, October 6). Syria conflict: Assad hints at Germany mediation role. BBC. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-24417767
Hersh, J. (2013, September 5). Syria Strike Plan Faces Shortcoming Over Unpredictability Of Assad’s Behavior. Huffington Post World. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/05/syria-strike-assad_n_3871339.html
– Zachary Jonas

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s